Thread:Arcaedia/@comment-27075564-20170328160219/@comment-24729554-20170328174054

I think the anon is correct, although there is slightly conflicting information about this. One email says:

">I'd like to investigate the possibility of resurrecting

>the bovine manipulation project (MJID-9803HU8932), with

>an eye towards recreating the "Gray" lifeform -- while

>the project was deemed a failure at the time, it _was_

>successful as a propaganda tactic in diverting attention

>away from actual Dreamland research."

which I would say confirms they're not really aliens and are meant as more of a diversion. Although it might be slightly speculative to say the idea is to discredit any whistle-blowers rather than just confuse the public. Do you think the current phrasing should be reworded at all? Thanks for asking!