Talk:Lazarus' radio segments (DXHR)

"Other locations"
I don't know the location of all of these radios so I put any I didn't know under Other locations. I'll try to add them to the proper section as I know them but if anyone else can help too that'd be great.

Although, there are a lot more segments than I thought there were when I started making this page. As a result, I think the Table of Contents is taking up too much room so I don't know whether to just scrap the locations subheaders altogether and just have the "names" of the segments? Or maybe keep the locations subheaders but just style the names to look like a heading while not having them as a "proper" heading.

Oh and since I just made up the "names" of the segments, if anyone can come up with a better name for any of them, feel free to change it. Iwantacallisto (talk) 03:16, February 17, 2015 (UTC)


 * Sections are handy, because: 1) they serve as anchors, so we can link to them directly; 2) we can edit them separately from the entire page.


 * As for the long TOC. The TOC is expanded by default only for the logged in users. Unregistered users see the TOC collapsed, and can show/hide it manually. So I think it should't be a problem for most visitors.


 * If the TOC is indeed too long, how about using the   template to create a TOC with only ==Level 2== headers? But for the template to work, it requires adding the following to the wiki's CSS (either MediaWiki:Common.css, or MediaWiki:Wikia.css, or maybe Qualaroo.scss?):

.toclimit-2 .toclevel-2, .toclimit-3 .toclevel-3, .toclimit-4 .toclevel-4, .toclimit-5 .toclevel-5, .toclimit-6 .toclevel-6, .toclimit-7 .toclevel-7 { display: none; }
 * Sugarhoney (talk) 09:45, February 17, 2015 (UTC)


 * True, and I think the locations sections put the radio segments into context so I might keep those too.


 * Oh cool, thanks. I was looking to put a limit on the headings displayed in the TOC before but couldn't find anything about it. I'm not sure how to implement it but I might test it out later.


 * Also, do you think that there is too much text that isn't broken up by an occasional image? Would it be worth putting an image related to the topic being discussed every few segments? Iwantacallisto (talk) 12:23, February 17, 2015 (UTC)


 * I'm good with just text. Though an image of the radio (the device) may be helpful, so the readers can know where exactly they can hear this.


 * I think ResistanZ knows how to edit the CSS. I left them a message. Sugarhoney (talk) 14:36, February 17, 2015 (UTC)