Board Thread:Projects/@comment-30128802-20180903165804/@comment-24729554-20180905140308

No worries if you don't have time, I have no problem doing it either!

Ah yes that should be updated as well. One alternative section title to "Mission appearances" or "Interactions" is to specify the game you're talking about, like "In Deus Ex: Mankind Divided" for example. This allows for interactions that don't occur during a particular mission to be mentioned, but also means that a separate section is needed for interactions over different games (so Pritchard for e.g. would need two). I'd prefer to know what yourself and other editors think of these options before choosing one. I'm probably leaning towards Interactions though, if I had to choose.

What's written in the manual of style about a possible article layout was only meant to be a rough guide for people new to the wiki. From my experience, it's hard to find a structure and even section titles that work for every article of a particular type. I agree we should aim for consistency though, but should also allow for flexibility in specific cases where the guidelines don't work well.

"History" is intended to be a parent section that discusses the entire activities of the Illuminati, including activities before the games themselves (i.e. background). So a possible fix is to have all of the background and activities information included as subsections to "History", like the Illuminati article. For Task Force 29, this would mean that Background and Activities would become the subsections of History, and Divisions, Notes, etc would be separate sections. What's your take on doing that?