Board Thread:Projects/@comment-30128802-20170725074359/@comment-30128802-20170725193114

Fair points, regarding the Jensen article.

On the issue of in-universe vs. not, I would suggest not taking the in-universe aspect too far, becuase many users rely on Wikis as an encylcopedic source. An encyclopedic article informs the reader of all relevant matters regarding the topic as efficiently as possible. This is distiguished from writing merely a formal literary abridgement.

I think it can be said that, for a Wiki, the encyclopedic aspect is primary and the  literary abridgement  aspect is secondary. In the Bob Page example, I would consider the above-mentioned description to be appropriate for the intro paragraph, because the fact that Bob Page is a main antogonist is a relevant encyclopedic fact.