Board Thread:Projects/@comment-30128802-20170725074359/@comment-30128802-20170725182032

Without a straightforward heading like "Deus Ex: Black Light," it might not be easy to come up with an alternative subheading, other than to use no subheading.

I think the reason why the Adam Jensen article turned to using book-name or game-name headings is that people were not certain what exactly should be the heading starting from Black Light.

In the Beth DuClare example, she's involved with two story arcs in Black Light that are very vaguely described, the first is the plan to hunt down Janus, and the second is Jensen's clone project (stated in even vaguer terms). We know she's important in the in-universe sense, but there's not enough information to make a clear heading. So the end result is no heading to distinguish between the events of Black Light and Mankind Divided? I'm ok with no separate heading, but just wanted to raise this point to people's attention. (EDIT: I think Beth DuClare is a bad example of this, becuase her article is so short. I just had it in mind becuase I was planning on expanding the article, and was thinking about whether the Black Light and Mankind Divided elements should be in separate headings if the article becomes long enough. I had done so in the Lucius DeBeers article).

Also, if everything is in-universe, then there would be no descriptions like "in the events of ______" or mention of mission names, even in the biography body? If everything is fully in-universe, it can be difficult for people who aren't lore experts to match the article to the games.