Board Thread:Projects/@comment-30128802-20180903165804/@comment-30128802-20180905163934

I think "Interactions" is better than "Game Name" as the section title given that we are using a canonical "Biography" section. The reason is that a canonical biography section also reports events that occured in a specifical game (and is not merely a "background" section containing backstory prior to events of a given game). Thus, having "Game Name" alongside "Biography" would cause confusion in regards to whether the two should overlap in content, because the distinction between "Game Name" content and "biography" content is not immediately clear from the section title itself.

On the other hand, "Interactions" more clearly suggests something different from "Biography" in that the former covers gameplay-content and gameplay-related choices that are not necessarily canonical. Therefore, given the existing organization of having a canonical biography section, I think "Interactions" is better than "Game Name."

"Game Name" can be a sub-section of "Interactions" if necessary (as in the case of game-name sections in the current "mission appearances" section of the Janus article).

I'd also like to add that another problem with "mission appearances" is that this section is difficult to consistently implement if the character appears in too many missions (like Jim Miller). What some Wikis do is that the list of missions is presented as a sub-component of "Interactions," if a list of missions is of interest.

For organizations, I agree with going with "History" as the main section, and "background" and "activities" as sub-section (if appropriate).