Board Thread:Projects/@comment-30128802-20180903165804/@comment-30128802-20180903195012

One part of the manual of style that could cause confusion is this paragraph under the "Content Criteria" section:

The last sentence above, if understood narrowly, would suggest that even the walkthrough articles that we have on this Wiki violate the guidelines.
 * All content needs to be objective. Opinions, gameplay strategy, and "my favorite"-style passages should not be added to articles. Accordingly, guides may only be posted as subpages of one's user page or as a blog.

I believe that the main intention of the above guideline is to delineate between subjective and objective content, rather than the type of content (gameplay guides). So for this purpose, I suggest rewriting it as follows to first clarify the subjective vs. objective distinction, and then apply this distinction to the context of gameplay strategy:

For the first sub-bullet, I suggest adding the policy of "neutral point of view." Other Wikis have an entire section on this (e.g., Wikipedia, Elder Scrolls Wiki)
 * All content must be objective. 
 * All content must be written from a neutral point of view, representing views fairly and without bias. Opinions and "my favorite"-style passages should not be added to articles. 
 * Content on gameplay strategy must be factual. Subjective guides may only be posted as subpages of one's user page or as a blog.

One example of something that doesn't presently meet the objectivity requirement, in my opintion, is the "Troops" section of the Dvali article. The images there, especially, don't present a neutral point of view on the topic but instead indicates editorial disparagement.

For the second sub-bullet point, it is my suggestion. I think you should address what type of strategy content is approrpirate.